MENTAL PROCESSES IN MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION OF LENGTH AND LOUDNESSKERST SM; HOWARD JH JR.1983; BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 21; NO 2; PP. 141-144; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

SHIFTS IN PERCEIVED SIZE AS A FUNCTION OF CONTRAST AND TEMPOREL MODULATIONGELB DJ; WILSON HR.1983; VISION RESEARCH (OXFORD); ISSN 0042-6989; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 23; NO 1; PP. 71-82; BIBL. 46 REF.Article

CONSTANT ERRORS OCCUR IN MATCHED REPRODUCTION OF ANGLES EVEN WHEN LIKELY BIASES ARE ELIMINATEDMACRAE AW; LOH HK.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 30; NO 4; PP. 341-346; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

FAILURE OF ADDITIVITY IN BISECTION OF LENGTH.ANDERSON NH.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 3; PP. 213-222; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

COLOR SENSATION OF NORMAL AND ANOMALOUS TRICHROMATS MEASURED BY MAGNITUDE ESTIMATIONHEMMINGER H; GEORGI W.1982; PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH; ISSN 0340-0727; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 44; NO 2; PP. 147-163; BIBL. 2 P.Article

EFFECT OF STIMULUS SIZE ON FUSION AND VERGENCEKERTESZ AE.1981; J. OPT. SOC. AM. (1930); ISSN 0030-3941; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 71; NO 3; PP. 289-293; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

VISUAL PERCEPTION OF CHANGING SIZE: THE EFFECT OF OBJECT SIZEBEVERLEY KI; REGAN D.1979; VISION RES.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 19; NO 10; PP. 1093-1104; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

ON LENGTH AND STRUCTURE IN SENTENCE PARSINGMILSARK GL.1983; COGNITION; ISSN 0010-0277; NLD; DA. 1983; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 129-134; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

ERROR PATTERNS IN THE JUDGMENT AND PRODUCTION OF NUMERICAL PROPORTIONS.BROOKE JB; MACRAE AW.1977; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 21; NO 4; PP. 336-340; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

TACIT KNOWLEDGE AND THE EFFECT OF PATTERN CONFIGURATION ON MENTAL SCANNINGREED SK; HOCK HS; LOCKHEAD GR et al.1983; MEMORY AND COGNITION; ISSN 0090-502X; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 11; NO 2; PP. 137-143; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ESTIMATION AND TESTING FOR DIFFERENCES IN EFFECT SIZE: A COMMENT ON HSUHEDGES LV.1982; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 91; NO 3; PP. 691-693; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

THE IMPOSSIBLE DREAM OF FECHNER AND STEVENSWEISS DJ.1981; PERCEPTION (LOND.); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 10; NO 4; PP. 431-434; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

ABSOLUTE ESTIMATION OF LINE LENGTH IN THREE AGE GROUPSVERRILLO RT.1981; J. GERONTOL. (KIRKWOOD); ISSN 0022-1422; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 36; NO 5; PP. 625-627; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

SLANT UNDERESTIMATION: A MODEL BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE VIEWING APERTUREPERRONE JA.1980; PERCEPTION; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 9; NO 3; PP. 285-302; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

EMPIRICAL TEST OF SCALE TYPE RESULTING FROM THE POWER LAW FOR HEAVINESSWESTERMANN R.1982; PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 55; NO 3; PART. 2; PP. 1167-1173; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE AXIS FEATURE: ILLUSIONARY EFFECTS ON CHILDREN'S JUDGMENTS OF LENGTHSCHER A.1982; PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 55; NO 3; PART 1; PP. 720-722; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

SUBJECT DIFFERENCES IN INPUT AND OUTPUT TRANSFORMATIONS FROM MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION OF DIFFERENCES.RULE SJ; CURTIS DW.1977; ACTA PSYCHOL.; PAYS-BAS; DA. 1977; VOL. 41; NO 1; PP. 61-65; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF STIMULUS SIMILARITY ON PERCEPTUAL AND CONCEPTUAL COMPARISONSROBBINS DW; BOURNE LE JR.1983; PERCEPTION AND PSYCHOPHYSICS; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 33; NO 5; PP. 479-486; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

SCALING APPARENT DISTANCE IN A LARGE OPEN FIELD: PRESENCE OF A STANDARD DOES NOT INCREASE THE EXPONENT OF THE POWER FUNCTIONDA SILVA JA; ALVES DOS SANTOS R.1982; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 55; NO 1; PP. 267-274; BIBL. 2 P.Article

STABILITY OF INDIVIDUAL LOUDNESS FUNCTIONS OBTAINED BY MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION AND PRODUCTIONHELLMAN RP.1981; PERCEPT. PSYCHOPHYS.; ISSN 0031-5117; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 29; NO 1; PP. 63-70; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

COMPARING TWO OBJECTS FOR SIZE AFTER A COMPARISON OF ONE OF THE OBJECTS WITH OTHER OBJECTSFILE PE; WILTON RN.1980; PERCEPTION (LOND.); ISSN 0301-0066; GBR; DA. 1980; VOL. 9; NO 5; PP. 555-560; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

THE EXPANDING-IMAGE EFFECT: THE CONCEPT OF TONAL VOLUME REUISITEDPERROTT DR; MUSICANT A; SCHWETHELM B et al.1980; J. AUD. RES.; ISSN 0021-9177; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 20; NO 1; PP. 43-56; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

TWO CLASSES OF MODELS FOR MAGNITUDE ESTIMATIONLUCE RD; BAIRD JC; GREEN DM et al.1980; J. MATH. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-2496; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 121-148; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

LETTER SIZE AND LEGIBILITYSMITH SL.1979; HUM. FACTORS; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 21; NO 6; PP. 661-670; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

USEFUL VISUAL FIELD SIZE FOR PATTERN PERCEPTIONSAIDA S; IKEDA M.1979; PERCEPT. AND PSYCHOPHYS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 25; NO 2; PP. 119-125; BIBL. 25 REF.Article